Una utile sintesi dei principali errori tecnici del MoSE nel documento presentato dal movimento NOMOSE a Copenaghen, al meeting sul clima (marzo 2009). Also in english

by Edoardo Salzano and Anthony Zamparutti. Paper presented and distributed at 37th International Making Cities Livable Conference, Siena, 15-18 June 2003.

Why the natural balance was broken, in a synthetic document (one of three, edited by Lidia Fersuoch) of Italia Nostra, Section of Venezia (2003)

The 28 basic reasons for oppose the dam system, in a bright document of Italia Nostra, Section of Venezia (2003)

From the website of Italia Nostra, Sezione di Venezia, the alternative proposal vs. the MoSE (2003)

Why the natural balance was broken, in a synthetic document (one of three, edited by Lidia Fersuoch) of Italia Nostra, Section of Venezia. At bottom, the links to other documents about the Lagoon of Venice.

Fabrizio Bottini suggested me (and translated in Italian) this part of the paper of Sir Colin Buchanan (Traffic in Towns. A study of the long term problems of traffic in urban areas. Reports of the Steering Group appointed by the Minister of Transport, Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London 1963): a veritable milestone of modern urbanism.

The original title is “Summary conclusions of the review made by the Commission for the assessment of environmental impact about the general project of the interventions at the lagoon mouths to regulate the tide flows”. It is the document delivered to the Ministry of the Environment in December 1998.

I wrote this essay for the rewiew AreaVasta in October 2003. It was published in the issue 6/7, Anno 4, July 2002- June 2003, printed in March 2004. I tried to explain what the Lagoon of Venice is, how it was wisely managed for 1000 years by the Serenissima Republic and how and why they are destroying it in XXth abd XXIth century

A report from the Lagoon of Venice, in The Ecologist, March 2003

A paper presented and distributed at 37th International Making Cities Livable Conference, Siena, 15-18 June 2003.

An article confirms that the current misgovernment of tourism flows is also damaging the city physical structure. From la Nuova di Venezia e Mestre 6th august 2003

The 28 basic reasons for oppose the dam system, in a bright document of Italia Nostra, Section of Venezia. At bottom, the links to other documents about the Lagoon.

From the website of Italia Nostra, Sezione di Venezia, the alternative proposal.

Book review: Luigi Scano, Venice:Terra e acqua (Venice: land and water), Edizioni delle autonomie, Roma 1985

Piero Bevilacqua is a great historian. I recommend everybody at least three of his books: On the usefulness of history (Sull’utilità della Storia), Venice and the Lagoon (Venezia e la Laguna), Between nature an history (Tra natura e storia). I did not like a presentation of his book on Venice. That is why I wrote him the following letter that I publish together with his reply.

Hereafter an article by Francesco Erbani from Repubblica 13th April 2003. And some remarks

From the 1973 Special Law to the Consorzio Venezia Nuova (Venezia Nuova Consortium), in Luigi Scano’s chronicles, documents and memories. A selection from: Luigi Scano, Venice: Earth and water, Edizioni delle autonomie, Roma 1985, and my postscriptum: Let’s actualize it to 2003.

On the 21st April 2003 the left wing political association April organised a crammed full meeting about “Another Venice”. The day after the meeting, I sent the chairman Paolo Peruzza these following notes.

Incredible: it is not Berlusconi, not Lunardi his Minister of Public Works, but is the centre-left coalition Mayor, Mr Paolo Costa, who stubbornly insists to build a subway under the lagoon. Hereafter two articles by Alberto Vitucci, from La Nuova Venezia 23rd and 25th July 2003, inform on the current threats

A letter from Andreina Zitelli, professor of Environmental Hygiene at IUAV – University of Venice, points out the issue, neglected until now, of the damage that the high tide regulation project (MoSE) would cause to the fragile ecological system in the Venice Lagoon. From the Gazzettino of the 11th of August, 2003.

Francesco Erbani ends his series of essays about Italian landscapes with an article about the Venice Lagoon, featured in 20 September 2003 Repubblica; here, perhaps for the first time, voice is given to the point of view of MoSE adversaries. Below it, a box about “The reasons in favour of MoSE”. We are confident that when the newspaper will talk about the activities of “Consorzio Venezia Nuova” (New Venice Consortium – the firm appointed for the building of the MoSe), it will publish a box for “The reasons in favour of the Lagoon”, too.

Paolo Lanapoppi is the president of "Pax in aqua" (Peace in Water), an association that fights the wave motion, a factor of degradation of lagoon and palaces and an obstacle to a soft use of the Lagoon of Venice. In this letter, published in the Gazzettino of Veniceon the 8th of January under the title “Sublagunar (underwater) subway, between perplexity and indecision”, Lanapoppi points out a serious deficit of our democratic society. An utmost serious deficit because, along with the lack of a widespread information, there is an increasingly more pervasive, deafening and sneaky propaganda. Is there democracy without information?